Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replica redirect read&write to master in standalone mode #325
base: unstable
Are you sure you want to change the base?
replica redirect read&write to master in standalone mode #325
Changes from 1 commit
8fce41e
0d83765
15163c9
be838bc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For cluster, we return the TLS port if the client is TLS and the non-TLS port if the client is non-TLS.
How can we handle this in standalone mode? Maybe we can only handle it if client connection and replication connection are both TLS or none of them is TLS? Otherwise return an error?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's not coupling client connection and replication connection together (just like client connection and cluster bus). Maybe we need a new dedicated port to do the replicatlication, and this is a breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zuiderkwast yes, this is a problem if users use both TLS port and non-TLS port. And now in standalone mode replicas and master doesn't know the port's info each other.
Maybe we can use REPLCONF or something to send the port's info, I incline to open another issue to discuss it. I think it's better to discuss them separately to avoid mixing them up and making the problem more complicated.
At the beginning of TLS design, the server adopted a two port model, but many related issues were not well resolved. For example, cluster can provide two different services, TLS and non TLS, until redis/redis#12233 fixed by @CharlesChen888 . TLS is a more macro level issue I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't implement something now to to make the replica know both ports of the primary, then at least we should only use the redirect when the client can use it. Otherwise we should just return an error. We can't return a non-TLS port to a TLS client and vice versa.
Another problem that @enjoy-binbin pointed out is the announced-ip and announced-port. If they are in use, then probably the primary is using them too and the client can't use the redirect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The actual scenario is more complex, involving not only non-TLS and TLS port issues but also concerns regarding network isolation and NAT. There are four distinct scenarios in general:
I understand all of these issues as we have encountered them in the production environment as well. We can thoroughly discuss these scenarios, but I would like to address the above issues step by step. I do not favor complicating things right from the start as it increases the complexity of engineering implementation.
This PR can resolve issue 1, achieving smooth switchover when it is within the same network and the same port. Then, we can proceed to solve the remaining issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.