Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update vitest monorepo #1149

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vitest/coverage-c8 (source) ^0.27.0 -> ^0.33.0 age adoption passing confidence
vitest (source) ^0.27.0 -> ^0.34.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-c8)

v0.33.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Revert default include patterns  -  by @​so1ve #​3729
    • 0.32.0 changed the default include globs to be compatible with Jest. After a discussion with the community, we are reverting this change because it turned out to be non-intuitive.
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.32.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Throw an error, if the module cannot be resolved  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3307 (1ad63)
    • Vitest used to fall back to the original import when it could not resolve it to the file path or the virtual module. This leads to hard-to-find module graph mismatches if you had incorrect alias or relied on relative imports to be resolved to the project root (which is usual behavior in TypeScript) because the code accidentally "worked". With this release, Vitest will now throw an error if it cannot resolve the module - there are possible edge cases that are not covered yet, so if you have any problems with this, please open a separate issue with reproduction.
  • Improve globs  -  by @​nickmccurdy in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3392 (19ecc)
    • Vitest now has glob patterns similar to Jest for better compatibility. It's possible that some files will be considered test files when previously they were not. For example, Vitest now considers test.js to be a test file. Also any file in __tests__ is now considered to be a test, not just files with test or spec suffix.
  • Add @vitest/coverage-v8 package  -  by @​AriPerkkio in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3339 (82112)
    • Vitest now uses v8 code coverage directly for better performance. @vitest/coverage-c8 is deprecated as Vitest no longer uses c8 package for coverage output. It will not be updated anymore, and Vitest will fail in the next version if the user has c8 as their coverage provider. Please, install the new @vitest/coverage-v8 package if you previously used @vitest/coverage-c8.
  • mocker: Don't restore mock to the original if the module is automocked  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3518 (c1004)
    • spy.mockRestore on auto-mocked named exports will no longer restore their implementation to the actual function. This behavior better matches what Jest does.
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.2

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.1

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.31.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
  • Remove browser from allowed pools inside poolMatchGlob config option. Please, use Vitest workspaces for running tests in the browser.

  • Move assertion declarations to expect package  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/3294 (cf3af)

    • The change should be minor:
    - declare namespace Vi {
    + declare module 'vitest' {
       interface Assertion<T = any> extends CustomMatchers<T> {}
       interface AsymmetricMatchersContaining extends CustomMatchers {}
    }
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.30.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.30.0

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.29.8

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v0.29.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

[v0.29.6](https://togithub.com/vitest-dev/vi


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 23, 2023

size-limit report 📦

Path Size Loading time (3g) Running time (snapdragon) Total time
dist/index.js 630 B (0%) 13 ms (0%) 85 ms (+45.68% 🔺) 97 ms

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1149 (4189488) into master (38f6403) will increase coverage by 1.20%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1149      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.88%   90.09%   +1.20%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         333      333              
  Branches       29       24       -5     
==========================================
+ Hits          296      300       +4     
+ Misses         37       33       -4     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.28.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.29.0 Feb 25, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.29.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.30.0 Apr 17, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 1c7c5fd to a5262fa Compare April 17, 2023 13:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from a5262fa to 4189488 Compare May 28, 2023 12:03
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.30.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.31.0 May 28, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.31.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.32.0 Jun 6, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 4189488 to 8606894 Compare June 6, 2023 19:00
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.32.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.33.0 Jul 6, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 8606894 to ca99a91 Compare July 6, 2023 16:56
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to ^0.33.0 chore(deps): update vitest monorepo Aug 1, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from ca99a91 to 466e75c Compare August 1, 2023 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant