Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make quantized model tests better #3495

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mcr229
Copy link
Contributor

@mcr229 mcr229 commented May 2, 2024

Summary:
XNNPACK should be testing with random inputs and quantized models should be calibrated before lowering and testing. Right now there are some numerical issues being debugged and tracked by: T187799178. this has been a bit difficult, but for now, we can first make these tests better by giving random inptus and enabling calibration.

We don't fix the numerical issues in this diff.

Differential Revision: D56906440

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 2, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/3495

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 25b6352 with merge base 4bd45c3 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label May 2, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56906440

Summary:

XNNPACK should be testing with random inputs and quantized models should be calibrated before lowering and testing. Right now there are some numerical issues being debugged and tracked by: T187799178. this has been a bit difficult, but for now, we can first make these tests better by giving random inptus and enabling calibration.  

We don't fix the numerical issues in this diff.

Differential Revision: D56906440
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56906440

@mcr229 mcr229 requested a review from digantdesai May 6, 2024 18:41
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 2835d01.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants