Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pseudo TLS #577

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Pseudo TLS #577

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

living42
Copy link

Hello, everyone.

I'm interested on porting the the idea from Cloak to gost. now i'm create this PR to see if there is a chance to merge it.

Notice this is a PoC, bug i'm planing to improve it, including:

  1. generating ephemeral key for every connection
  2. configurable encryption algorithm.
  3. write some tests
  4. (maybe) do some research about TLS, to see if we can make it more like normal TLS connection

Let me known what's your thought.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #577 into master will decrease coverage by 3.85%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #577      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.93%   47.07%   -3.86%     
==========================================
  Files          36       37       +1     
  Lines        8376     9072     +696     
==========================================
+ Hits         4266     4271       +5     
- Misses       3622     4314     +692     
+ Partials      488      487       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
node.go 52.02% <0.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️
ptls.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
sni.go 53.80% <0.00%> (-0.56%) ⬇️
socks.go 56.79% <0.00%> (+0.39%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8ab2fe6...4947074. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant