Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(autoname): Make deferred naming for GL entry and Stock Ledger entry optional #41472

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Bensikrac
Copy link

Stock Ledger Entry and GL Entry use a naming system where the final name is only generated by a scheduled job, which makes the naming unstable. This has the tendency to break external applications relying on the naming scheme being final, due to hooks on document submission. Therefore this should be an optional feature, which can be enabled in the accounts settings if needed due to low database performance. This feature also causes a lot of confusion and not much benefit currently, which means by default this should be off.
This got included in #16358

closes #36337 by giving the fix of names being immediately aligned to the scheme

Stock Ledger Entry and GL Entry use a naming system where the final name is only generated by a cron
job, which makes the naming unstable. This has the tendency to break external applications relying on the
naming scheme being final. Therefore this should be an optional feature, which can be enabled in the
accounts settings if needed due to low database performance.

Signed-off-by: Benedek Major <benedek.major@mabeney.com>
Copy link

stale bot commented May 31, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed within 3 days if no further activity occurs, but it only takes a comment to keep a contribution alive :) Also, even if it is closed, you can always reopen the PR when you're ready. Thank you for contributing.

@stale stale bot added the inactive label May 31, 2024
@Bensikrac
Copy link
Author

Could someone approve the workflows?
@deepeshgarg007 @ruthra-kumar

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant