Fingerpriting cpu cores and memory like popular Dolphin-Anty an anti detect browser does?

[Jazzykhan]

Description

Allow a method in flags to spoof memory and/or cpu for fingerprint spoofing

Who's implementing?

• I'm willing to implement this feature myself

The problem

It only has canvas fingerprinting right now but still cpu cores and memory is real as per my computer.

Possible solutions

Command line flags to spoof cpu and/or flags or any help how to do it?

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

[Arthur-Senior]

I have done already some Moks on Browser, I can upload my work. I am mocking everything from memory till GL-Fingerprint

[PF4Public]

I have done already some Moks on Browser, I can upload my work. I am mocking everything from memory till GL-Fingerprint

May I inquire how do you achieve that?

[Arthur-Senior]

I took all the data to a config file and exchange parameters in the functions inside. The V8 mechanism is taking parameters from classes I n tbe middle, the work of the app is not disturbed, because it's not on working level. пт, 7 июн. 2024 г., 19:56 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

I have done already some Moks on Browser, I can upload my work. I am mocking everything from memory till GL-Fingerprint May I inquire how do you achieve that? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QADTERWHKIADOG4LRHLZGHX4JAVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVGI3TQNBVHA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PF4Public]

I took all the data to a config file and exchange parameters in the functions inside. The V8 mechanism is taking parameters from classes I n tbe middle, the work of the app is not disturbed, because it's not on working level.

So you changed those parameters in a profile config file? Are those parameters not recalculated every time in runtime?

[Arthur-Senior]

I changed it in runtime, it is read once on load and given to a singleton structure inside the chrome.dll. so, you can have n*instance with different settings and it can moc even the system and browser type пт, 7 июн. 2024 г., 20:33 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

I took all the data to a config file and exchange parameters in the functions inside. The V8 mechanism is taking parameters from classes I n tbe middle, the work of the app is not disturbed, because it's not on working level. So you changed those parameters in a profile config file? Are those parameters not recalculated every time in runtime? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QADCLW7OZXB2CUKKV4LZGH4I7AVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVGMZDSNRWHA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Arthur-Senior]

I can send you some screens, how it is doing with original system and my system. пт, 7 июн. 2024 г., 20:33 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

I took all the data to a config file and exchange parameters in the functions inside. The V8 mechanism is taking parameters from classes I n tbe middle, the work of the app is not disturbed, because it's not on working level. So you changed those parameters in a profile config file? Are those parameters not recalculated every time in runtime? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QADCLW7OZXB2CUKKV4LZGH4I7AVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVGMZDSNRWHA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PF4Public]

I changed it in runtime, it is read once on load and given to a singleton
structure inside the chrome.dll. so, you can have n*instance with different
settings and it can moc even the system and browser type

I still don't get it how you do it. Could you explain it in more details?

PS: I've hidden your last message as it is unrelated here.

[Arthur-Senior]

I changed on example font_cache.cc and font_list_impl.cc to implement fonts from my config file. When a function in V8 system checked if font is present, it looks up in my list and say yes or not. the hole system, can use all the fonts on system, in registry and wherever. Can you please send me the utility missing for my problem please?

[Arthur-Senior]

I would like to join the project and make the mocking options for it, if you like. пт, 7 июн. 2024 г., 19:56 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

I have done already some Moks on Browser, I can upload my work. I am mocking everything from memory till GL-Fingerprint May I inquire how do you achieve that? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QADTERWHKIADOG4LRHLZGHX4JAVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVGI3TQNBVHA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PF4Public]

I changed on example font_cache.cc and font_list_impl.cc to implement fonts
from my config file.

Do you have a repository with your changes anywhere?

[Arthur-Senior]

No, all offline. I can give some changes in files or single functions сб, 8 июн. 2024 г., 13:59 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

I changed on example font_cache.cc and font_list_impl.cc to implement fonts from my config file. Do you have a repository with your changes anywhere? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QADPVHT7EXDI7VVKZRTZGLWYVAVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJWGAYDKNZSGY> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[PF4Public]

It could be of interest if it was written solely by you (not copied from somewhere) and could be integrated seamlessly into ungoogled-chromium. For the latter it should ideally be exposing a flag for user-configuration.

[Arthur-Senior]

This can be done. It is to100% my own work and code. And yes, it can be used with a user configuration. Currently. I am planning to rebuild it to json from config file. сб, 8 июн. 2024 г., 15:04 PF4Public ***@***.***>:

…

It could be of interest if it was written solely by you (not copied from somewhere) and could be integrated seamlessly into ungoogled-chromium. For the latter it should ideally be exposing a flag for user-configuration. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2868 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6B3QAEC4JENWJOUJ74M4OTZGL6NBAVCNFSM6AAAAABH4PNJ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJWGAZTAMJZGQ> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Arthur-Senior]

Here 2 pics. one with files, which where patched for mocks. and another with example of patch.

[PF4Public]

@Arthur-Senior If you're willing to contribute new features to ungoogled-chromium you are always free to submit PR with your code. I would however advise you to open a separate issue to discuss the changes you're proposing. Providing the actual code/patches instead of screenshots would also help the discussion.

[Arthur-Senior]

I would like to help developing ungoogled-Browser, and mocking features i worked the complete last year on. With my knowladge what is to be done and your little help on things where i am stacked, Could be a good thing.

[Jazzykhan]

@Arthur-Senior were you able to mock cpu cores and memory?
Thanks