Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(scope-manager): handle index signature in class #9054

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan commented May 6, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @yeonjuan!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 6, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e8422cc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6638ef0df6701a0008cfee26
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9054--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 97 (no change from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval One team member has approved this PR; a second should be enough to merge it label May 31, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just requesting more tests. Code looks good to me

Comment on lines +692 to +696
type Foo = string;
export class Bar {
[x: Foo]: any;
}
`,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a test for [x: string]: Foo?

@@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ const obj = {
},
};
`,
`
class Foo {
[x: string]: any;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add invalid versions? Both [x: Foo]: string and [x: string]: Foo

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
class Foo {
[x: string]: any;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should also use [x: Foo]: string and [x: string]: Foo here, otherwise the snapshot doesn't contain anything about the index signature

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 approval One team member has approved this PR; a second should be enough to merge it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: no-undef a error analysis
3 participants