Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Does this have feature parity with snoowrap? #42

Answered by thislooksfun
FoxxMD asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Short answer

Not yet, check #46 for progress

Long answer

There are still several large areas of the codebase that need work, namely own-user methods, private messaging, modmail, and flairs. For a full class-by-class rundown of what is missing see below.

Snoowrap Classes:

Notes/caveats:

  • This is comparing snoowrap@1.23.0 against snoots@v1.0.0-dev.14.
  • The names used here are snoowrap's names. snoots' naming scheme is often different.
  • I tried to be as complete as possible but it's likely I missed something.
  • This does not cover any method parameters, just the methods themselves.

snoowrap

  • Missing properties
    • accessToken1
    • clientId1
    • clientSecret1
    • password1
    • ratelimitExpiration
    • ratelimitRemaining

Replies: 1 comment 7 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
7 replies
@FoxxMD
Comment options

@FoxxMD
Comment options

@thislooksfun
Comment options

@thislooksfun
Comment options

@thislooksfun
Comment options

Answer selected by thislooksfun
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants