Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"High Quality Segmentation for Ultra High-resolution Images" don't see the difference between image #24

Open
trinh-hoang-hiep opened this issue Sep 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@trinh-hoang-hiep
Copy link

hello, thanks for your great work High Quality Segmentation.
I want to ask the following 2 questions

  1. I don't see any difference in P position information between images. Even in an image, the information of the variable rel_cell is the same in all locations. So why can CRM generate detailed segmentation masks?
  2. What is the meaning of calculating 3 features in P because it seems to me that it is hard-fixed and concatenated into each feature of the image?
    below is the map that I printed out for the variables

image
image

@tcShen
Copy link
Collaborator

tcShen commented Sep 6, 2022

(1) For rel_cell, when the input resolution changes (the target resolution is constant), it is not same. That CRM generates detailed segmentation masks not only results from rel_cell. Other designs also contribute to the final results.
(2) The hard-fixed position information doesn't mean it's unsuitable for representation. Fixed and learnable position information is both used in the implicit representation.
Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants