Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue about PatchGAN #203

Open
thomascong121 opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Issue about PatchGAN #203

thomascong121 opened this issue Nov 9, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@thomascong121
Copy link

Hi:

I am wondering why it is sufficient to restrict attention to the structure in local image patches to model high-level features?

@phillipi
Copy link
Owner

phillipi commented Nov 9, 2020

This is an interesting question. One thing to recognize first is that the generator has receptive fields that cover the entire image, and that's what allows the generator to model high-level features. The PatchGAN discriminator can indeed get away with relatively small receptive fields, and ultimately that's related to natural image statistics, the level of stochasticity in the mapping you are learning, and the spatial density of information in the input image to the generator.

@lizijue
Copy link

lizijue commented Jan 14, 2022

Hello, I wonder why it is available for discriminator to just force high-frequency correctness by restricting its receptive field in local image patches?

It is my understanding that it change the whole task of determining a picture is true or false into many sub-tasks of determining a image patch is true or false, which greatly reduces the complexity of the task, and it ultimately help to improve the performance, but nothing to do with the high-frequency information.

Could you please explain it for me? Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants