Organization Repositories Page Beta Feedback

[pablonete]

We're excited to announce that the new organization repositories page is in Beta 🥳

Find it under orgs/org-name/repositories or by clicking the Repositories tab in your organization.

It comes with a sidebar and a suggestions engine to help writing your search query.

Let us know what you think by reacting here or posting your feedback below. Thank you!

[hey2022]

Is there a way to sort repositories by stars?

[Adilet0108]

Огонь

[mchittineni]

the old view was much better than this

[turiot]

Yes, the lack of language filtering is disappointing.

[ansh-devs]

❤️ sure

[NipunBinjola]

The language filter is still there, when you click in the search bar it shows a list of applicable filters

[patapata24]

sure

[savvin-dev]

In the previous version, the distance between elements gave enough information in one point where the eyes were looking. Now it has become "painful" to look at the list, it is impossible to focus in one point because of too many elements in one place.

UPD: Also, it looks very bright on the dark theme, all trying to get in my eyes.

[GavynHolt]

Font is suddenly way to small.

[msangals]

You can choose between two design options, I think this is a good compromise for people who like smaller fonts.

[Sheunzy]

Yes...i think this should be re adjust

[nadirsidi]

I would like to see the repo names in bold

[swang81]

Great learning resources, albeit with occasional minor bugs. I'll assist in identifying and addressing these issues to continually enhance its quality.

[MathiasAugustesen]

I have low zoom in general, but the repositories are too small. More than 60% of it is blank space. Search functionality is very good :)

[Mansourbeik]

Yes

[mac2000]

Quite nice one 💪

Here is missing use case:

- I need to find an repo with python code 🤔 so I can choose where to add sonar next, but not it become a problem

Also, from current UI it seems like it won't be possible to combine filters - aka what if for some reason I need quickly list public archived repos or something like that

Silly me, did not figured out how powerful new search input is 🔥

[pukmajster]

I kinda like it. One could argue there's lots of wasted space, but the repos are nicely listed.

[j-fulbright]

I like it! More modern and useful.

[msangals]

Much simpler and the UI looks much cleaner now, so you can also switch to a more compact design. Great work 💪.

[halitsever]

Compact view option is great but it feels little bit dense. I need some time to get used to it 😬

[ksbde]

Have we got an option to return on old design?

[ad-si]

In the left sidebar there is tons of whitespace while quite a lot of the description in the repo list is cut off.

[darlanalves]

If you squeeze the width a liiitle bit more, the whole sidebar turns into a dropdown.

[chrispat]

We made some adjustments to the default width and adjusted the point where the sidebar turns into a dropdown so it happens sooner and the description does not squeeze the description so much.

[Aerowiel]

Sorry but I don't like the new design at all, its waaaaaaaaaaaay too small

[zhaojc]

agree

[Atugatran]

Old is Better

[Tourch-tech]

I think so too

[CC11001100]

Not enough space here to display? What is the product design idea? Do you think users are idiots? Do you have a product manager?

[CC11001100]

If there is a product manager, please fire him, he is paddling the water...

[githubofkrishnadhas]

The new appearence of UI in beta phase is nice feature. but at the same time it is occupying a lot of space unnecessarly. 🚀probably you can make it to a collapsible and expandable mode.

• The new section can be made as a collapsible/expandable window as necessary will be better in my opinion.cc @pablonete

[ianwilliams1]

I kind of like this idea, except for the fact the collapsing sidebar implementation on the github docs site seems completely botched up for me.

[ethanc8]

What does the "Sources" category mean?

[yasmin-movingpay]

Is there any way I can separate the repositories by categories?

[GlebIrovich]

Hey! One of the way to categorize your repositories is Custom Properties.

[cyrilcrypy]

i love this new view, the UI is perfect

[AndruC]

Would be nice to see "Repositories I've interacted with most/recently"

[DietzelGitAdmin]

STOP HIDDING THE MOTHER LUVIN REPO LIST BUTTON. NOBODY CARE'S ABOUT ALL THIS FLUFF.
Just show me my repo list and go home.

[Binsarpanjaitan10l]

We're excited to announce that the new organization repositories page is in Beta 🥳

Find it under orgs/org-name/repositories or by clicking the Repositories tab in your organization.

It comes with a sidebar and a suggestions engine to help writing your search query.

Let us know what you think by reacting here or posting your feedback below. Thank you!

I

[csmykay]

You still don't have an easy simple way to group repo's? Gitlab has had this for years.

[bewuethr]

Custom properties fill that gap for me.

[Arinomama22]

Tell me i need resource in artela connect abstarction

[tynevi]

• The page needs to provide exact numbers of repos, the shortened number is not helpful.
• CSV export of list or repos and associated data. I have to manage thousands of repos and these barely filterable, page-by-page results are not useful. GitHub organization management is extremely difficult with the UI provided, it's like every GitHub page assumes a handful of repositories, nothing is built for management of repos and orgs at large scale.

[maurobernal]

In modo reducer should show the PRs they have pending