Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make memary free to use through Llama 3 8B and Ollama #31

Closed
kingjulio8238 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #36
Closed

Make memary free to use through Llama 3 8B and Ollama #31

kingjulio8238 opened this issue May 8, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #36
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kingjulio8238
Copy link
Owner

memary uses GPT 4 for most LLM calls which doesn't allow the community to use memary for free. It would be highly beneficial to see a shift from using GPT 4 to Llama 3 8B. We would also like to see LLaVA being used for the agent's vision tool.

Additionally, we would like the community to be able to run these models locally and there's no better way than using Ollama. LLaVa (original and fine-tuned) can be found here: https://ollama.com/library?q=llava

Main Changes:

  1. Replace GPT 4 with Llama 3 8B
  2. Replace gpt-4-preview with LLaVa for agent's vision tool
  3. Host these models locally using Ollama
@kingjulio8238 kingjulio8238 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2024
@kingjulio8238
Copy link
Owner Author

see PR #19 for reference.

@kevinl424
Copy link
Collaborator

Update

Instead of replacing GPT 4 and gpt-4-preview with Llama 3 8B and LLaVa respectively, include a model setup functionality for users to choose which models and keys they want to provide. Allows for more flexibility for end users.

@kevinl424 kevinl424 self-assigned this May 9, 2024
@shreybirmiwal
Copy link
Contributor

Started on pr #32 but a little stuck for now

@kevinl424 kevinl424 linked a pull request May 11, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants