Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Client / Server, remote location, multiple users #586

Open
mitchweaver opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@mitchweaver
Copy link

Apologize if I'm misunderstanding, but is there no way to install buku as a server to enable for remote-access and/or multiple user connections?

I'm imagining for example a buku "instance" installed and an exposed port you could do buku --remote ip:port to access.

Currently this is theoretically possible by using the --db tag and having an NFS mount of the server's db, on each client. This works... but is messy.

Any plans to support this more natively?

@rachmadaniHaryono
Copy link
Collaborator

for now, no.

i don't recommend to add any new feature request for bukuserver until the required package is update

for multiple user, the only way to do it is to use multiple ip and port combination with DB_FILE env variable point to different files

@rachmadaniHaryono rachmadaniHaryono mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2022
71 tasks
@piegamesde
Copy link

Please don't add any authentication, user management or other features like this to Buku. I like Buku because it is inherently single-user only and local-first, unlike many other bookmarking systems. Those features make installation more complex and are hard to get right, both from a UX perspective and security.

@LeXofLeviafan
Copy link
Collaborator

Should there be a need for authentication (i.e. to limit external access), such a thing can probably be achieved by proxying the access through a proper web-server (such as nginx); so I don't believe there's any reason to add it into the app itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants