Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: "Tile" layout should have icons to the left #816

Open
denilsonsa opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Suggestion: "Tile" layout should have icons to the left #816

denilsonsa opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
feature New feature

Comments

@denilsonsa
Copy link

When using the "Tile" View Mode, all the codes are displayed neatly in a very compact way. However, the icons are now right-aligned. This means the icons can be too far from their labels. In fact, the icons are now closer to the label of the other tile. Look:

Screenshot

The left icons are about 82px away from the labels of the right tiles. Meanwhile, GitLab icon is 222px away from its label, and LinkedIn is 253px away.

As comparison, if you look at any file manager, the icons are always to the left of their filenames (or above the filename, when displaying as thumbnails, but let's ignore this case). Thus, it's a common visual language to have the icon to the left of their labels. (Well, assuming LTR direction, everything gets reversed for RTL languages.)

As a suggestion, I'd propose moving the icons to the left of the labels. Like this mockup:

Mockup

This change will also keep it consistent with the other View Modes, as those already have the icon to the left of the label.

@denilsonsa denilsonsa added the feature New feature label May 29, 2023
@jamie-mh
Copy link
Owner

This layout was chosen because of the placement of the refresh button on HOTP entries. I'll try moving the button to the right of the code, like in your mockup and see what it looks like.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants