You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I have a suite that ordinarily passes, but change something in the prior recording to cause a failure:
The build fails as expected, but the root cause is obscured as the servirtium side isn't handing root cause back to the test runner side. (It cannot/should't over the socket response)
Something near to stop() time would be great:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also how do you get test-failed true/false and exception in @AfterEach without boilerplate. I sure hope JUnit5 gets such additions. There's a TestInfo class that can be injected optionally into @AfterEach but it is anemic.
On 21 Feb 2021, 22:34 +0000, Paul Hammant ***@***.***>, wrote:
Cos I might be about to pair program this with a pal - ***@***.***
Also how do you get test-failed true/false and exception in @AfterEach without boilerplate. I sure hope JUnit5 gets such additions. There's a TestInfo class that can be injected optionally into @AfterEach but it is anemic.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
If I have a suite that ordinarily passes, but change something in the prior recording to cause a failure:
The build fails as expected, but the root cause is obscured as the servirtium side isn't handing root cause back to the test runner side. (It cannot/should't over the socket response)
Something near to stop() time would be great:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: