Thanks for the PR. I believe the correct course UX is to have only and only one checkbox that works universally on all DEs and OSs. What I mean is that the user should not care which feature they should toggle based on what software stack they are using. So if we cannot turn off cursor in Gnome Wayland or KDE or Windows, we should somehow show a message to the user and inform them why the checkbox is disabled.

In this implementation the Windows, Mac, and BSD users will just get a disabled checkbox without any explanation, and the Gnome and KDE users will get different tooltip.

I believe it is better if

• we can show a red text above this checkbox to notify the user
• include Mac and BSD in the mix by reversing the if statement condition to if linux -> if wayland -> if not gnome or not kde -> ...

This PR also addresses #604 in a way (giving control over showing cursor in Wayland)

Aesthetically I like it, but the point is that users rarely check the tooltip for more info. How about adding a ℹ️ or something similar at the end of such items that kind of invite/attract the user to click/hover to get the reason on why this is red.

Btw, thanks for your efforts and responsiveness 👍

@mmahmoudian Thank you for your kind words.

On second thought I think adding a text is a better idea precisely because of the reason you've mentioned. I just deleted my comment because my design was such a minor difference that I didn't think it'd be worth mentioning... Besides, whether an unsupported environment actually grabs the cursor or not is outside our control, so informing the user about the issue on first sight resolves the ambiguity of a disabled-but-checked box.

In the end this is what it looks like: