Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the feature to have custom config #1368

Open
Anindyadeep opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 0 comments 路 May be fixed by #1367
Open

Add the feature to have custom config #1368

Anindyadeep opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 0 comments 路 May be fixed by #1367

Comments

@Anindyadeep
Copy link

馃殌 The feature

Add support for validating and accepting custom config class schema

Motivation, pitch

Currently, there is very less support for custom config classes, however, we can not fully generalised that all provider or object will have same configurations. There could be additonal configs or may be same configs but names might be changes.

One way to solve this is to inherit from the BaseConfigClass and then make a custom config class. However, the schema validation code does not supports validating custom config.

@Anindyadeep Anindyadeep linked a pull request May 16, 2024 that will close this issue
16 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant