Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Able to offer several features via PR if this project still active #12

Open
drgrib opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Able to offer several features via PR if this project still active #12

drgrib opened this issue Jan 13, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@drgrib
Copy link

drgrib commented Jan 13, 2018

After downloading your workflow, which I found helpful and well-designed, I went to work adding a few additional features that I had grown accustomed to in the Evernote Workflow:

  • Adds Show tag suggestions during note creation #9
  • Adds bls command to "list" the most recent bear notes without having to remember their titles and search for them
  • Opens a note from bs in its own window without opening the main window
  • Adds text from clipboard to bn note
    • Opens note in its own window without opening the main window
    • User can hold cmd to suppress opening its window
  • Limits all queries to 25, substantially improving performance (it is unlikely a user would scroll through more than 25 results in the Alfred interface)

However, I noticed that you have a PR that is still open from Nov 7, 2017 and don't want to spend time setting up my own PR if this project isn't in active development.

@chrisbro
Copy link
Owner

@drgrib Get it spun up and I'll knock it out this week! Thank you!

@drgrib
Copy link
Author

drgrib commented Jan 16, 2018

@chrisbro Cool :) Just added intersecting tag search in bs, e.g. bs #tag1 #tag2 will return only notes with both tags. Also bs now fully operates on tags, so bs #tag1 will only show notes with #tag1 and bs #tag1 text will only show notes with #tag1 containing text. Finally, these all order the results title first, then text. So if a note contains the keywords in its title, it is higher in the list than one which only has it in its text.

I think these features in bs may render bst unnecessary.

Fair warning: I've made a bit of a mix of our two code styles in the code and it may warrant some cleanup. But it is all functional with little unused code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants