-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change all references from sway, to swayfx #191
Comments
What you could do in the meantime is to build it manually and run that executable in a tty while still having sway installed.
And run |
Probably related: I looked into building a debian package for swayfx, but the binaries and manpages conflict with the regular sway package. I could hack around this by renaming |
I concur with renaming all references to sway, allowing both to be installed at the same time - with separate configs for both. Sway have made their bed re. hard refusal to modernize and accomodate a growing number of users wanting simple effects, this fork would benefit from being more independent. |
I came here to say exactly this - thanks to OP for the fluent report. |
Hey,
I wanna try this fork on fedora 38. Installing this though, means I have to uninstall sway, sway-config-upstream, and a lot of other dependencies and unused packages that the official sway pkg relies on, and I need.
The official sway maintainers have stated multiple times that they don't plan on implementing the features you have added, and don't plan to merge a fork like this.
I suggest just renaming all references in code from "sway" to "swayfx", or any name of your choosing. This will mean that people using sway as their daily driver, don't have to uninstall it just to try this project out. and both compositors can live happily in a system.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: