Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make intermediate buffer optional #30

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Make intermediate buffer optional #30

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 30, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Collaborator

Someone on the forum argued it is a big overhead... got to check if we can 
easily switch it on/off.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by michael.broutin@gmail.com on 24 Jan 2011 at 7:10

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

What I'd like to do for this issue:
- Keep the intermediate buffer : it could be useful later on (attaching tags 
and other logical info to vertices), but with an option to have direct output.
- Get rid of ManualObject : it's very useful and easy to use to begin with, but 
it's yet another layer of vertices buffering...

Original comment by michael.broutin@gmail.com on 12 Aug 2011 at 7:23

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Even if ManualObject is gotten rid of, there should still be "dynamic mode" : a 
mode where you can easily tweak parameters of a generator, and see the result 
immediately, without necessarily recreating the hardware buffers.
Example use case : you want to draw a road in sim city game, and see the result 
of your editing as you move the mouse cursor.

Original comment by michael.broutin@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2012 at 5:16

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant