Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why is Mirascope failing on NER beyond 2 levels? #259

Open
willbakst opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Why is Mirascope failing on NER beyond 2 levels? #259

willbakst opened this issue May 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feedback wanted Please provide feedback help wanted Extra attention is needed Question Further information is needed

Comments

@willbakst
Copy link
Contributor

Marie Stephen Leo posted about Mirascope on LinkedIn and noted that it missed a single deep nested field in the third nested level of an NER task (and it looks like in the original post before this one that fructose succeeds for this task).

Why is this the case? I think this is something worth looking into. If fructose can do it, then there must be a way for Mirascope to do it without having to wait on model improvements.

Want to use this as an open discussion as I look deeper into why this might be the case and how we can make Mirascope structured extraction as good as possible (with solving this failure as the next step).

@willbakst willbakst added help wanted Extra attention is needed feedback wanted Please provide feedback Question Further information is needed labels May 19, 2024
@willbakst willbakst self-assigned this May 19, 2024
@willbakst willbakst removed their assignment Jun 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feedback wanted Please provide feedback help wanted Extra attention is needed Question Further information is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant