Create a way for has-one relationship use .create (created after #472)

[FCO]

take a look at #472

[FCO]

The interesting part of it is that it is actually possible set attribute type to the model it is refers to. I.e.:
...
Foo.attr.WHICH # MyModel

@vrurg but on that case, Foo.attr should return a Red::Column to make it possible to be used inside .map, .grep, etc...

[FCO]

As @jonathanstowe have said on the original issue, I think returning a model type would be the best way, it could use the .join-on (the same method we use to find joins) to create it with the right external ids... I'll give it a try as soon as possible!

If we do that change, should that generate a new API version?

[jonathanstowe]

I don't think it needs a different API version, because Empty is false, a type object is false.

[FCO]

I'm still trying to figure out why... but my change is working if I define the referencing's model as type and does not work if I define it as string:

[FCO]

for now: #523

[FCO]

There are still some bugs on it... but it seems to be mostly working...