Should we remove the WiP from the description?

[FCO]

No description provided.

[atroxaper]

Probably we need a roadmap to reach version 1.0 (like cro project has).

[jonathanstowe]

I think for some people the "WIP" tag may make them think that there is going to be a lot of self assembly required so they may pass it by, and there won't be a crucial bug report or feature request. I think "Alpha release" might be better as it gives the impression of "working but there may be some rough edges" and encourages a different level of participation.

And yeah a realistic set of criteria by which it would move to "Beta" and "Full release" (bearing in mind that a lot of outstanding feature requests might be "nice to have" or even quite specific to one persons needs rather than firm requirements for general use.)

[FCO]

Ok, that makes sense! So, what do you guys think are the basic features we should have for our first beta release?

[FCO]

https://github.com/FCO/Red/projects/3

[FCO]

I've created that Beta release project with 25 issues. I think when those issues become closed, we can remove the WiP from the description.

[patrickbkr]

I like, that you take documentation seriously.