Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about generating result jitter #29

Open
cyk990422 opened this issue Apr 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Question about generating result jitter #29

cyk990422 opened this issue Apr 22, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@cyk990422
Copy link

Hi, thank you so much for sharing such an interesting job. May I ask if the results generated by your VAE in the early stage of training, such as 1000-2000 epochs, will have motion jitter, and do you need to add some smoothing filters such as euros?

@ChenFengYe
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for your attention. I have not added such euro filters, but it could help. You can refer to
https://github.com/mkocabas/VIBE/blob/851f779407445b75cd1926402f61c931568c6947/demo.py#L229

For our implementation, we just trained the VAE part much longer for better motion quality. You can set it to 3000 or 4000 epochs.

@cyk990422
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your timely reply. Have you tried to use only rot6D as input for training? Is there any motion jitter?

@ChenFengYe
Copy link
Owner

I have tried rot6d in the early research, which is much smooth compared to the rotation vector.
Rot6d even is the greatest representation for the motion-only generation, I believe, to avoid motion jitter.
However, it could cause global artifacts, like foot-sliding on the ground. If you do not care about that, rot6d is great.

@cyk990422
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much for your patience, I will try it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants